When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
Musk-OpenAI lawsuit will proceed after a U.S. judge cleared the case for trial. The ruling marks a setback for OpenAI and its leadership. Elon Musk sued OpenAI and its co-founders in 2024, accusing them of abandoning the organisation’s founding mission. According to Musk, OpenAI chose profit over public benefit.
Read Also: Perplexity AI Faces Lawsuit From Britannica and Merriam-Webster
In addition, Musk helped found OpenAI and financially backed it. He says the group promised to remain a nonprofit. Those assurances shaped his early support and credibility. However, OpenAI later pursued a for-profit structure. This lawsuit centres on that alleged breach.
District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers carefully reviewed the evidence. She found enough support for Musk’s claims to justify a trial. The judge cited internal assurances about nonprofit control. Those statements form the core of Musk’s argument. As a result, the case now moves forward.
Musk-OpenAI Lawsuit Traces Roots to Internal Split
Musk-OpenAI lawsuit reflects years of tension between the parties. Musk left OpenAI’s board in 2018 when his attempt to become chief executive failed. Instead, the board selected Sam Altman.
At the time, Musk cited conflicts with Tesla’s AI work. However, disagreements over strategy had already surfaced. OpenAI sought massive funding to scale operations. That ambition pushed leaders toward new structures. The lawsuit challenges those decisions directly.
Read Also: Elon Musk’s xAI Files a Lawsuit Against Apple and OpenAI
In 2019, OpenAI created a for-profit subsidiary. The company adopted a capped profit model, limiting investor returns. Leaders said the change enabled rapid growth. Musk disputes that justification.
Musk OpenAI lawsuit failed to block OpenAI’s restructuring. In October 2025, the process reached completion. The for-profit arm became a Public Benefit Corporation. The original nonprofit retained a minority equity stake.
Despite that change, Musk continues to press his claims. He seeks financial damages for what he calls ill-got gains. Musk says he invested about $38 million early on. He also provided guidance and credibility. Musk OpenAI lawsuit argues those contributions rested on false promises.
Musk earlier made a bold move by offering $97.4 billion to buy OpenAI outright. Altman rejected the offer without hesitation, as the bid deepened public tensions. It also underscored Musk’s opposition to OpenAI’s direction.
Lawsuit Draws Sharp Responses
The Musk-OpenAI lawsuit has drawn strong reactions, as OpenAI dismissed the claims as baseless. A spokesperson described the suit as harassment. The company denies misleading Musk.
Read Also: Meta Targeted Ads Lawsuit Forces Meta to Stop Tracking Tanya O’Carroll’s Data for Ad Targeting
Judge Gonzalez Rogers disagreed at this stage. She emphasised that a trial does not equal guilt. However, she stressed that evidence deserved scrutiny. A jury will now assess credibility and intent. Musk-OpenAI lawsuit will face that test in March.
The case highlights larger questions about tech governance. It raises issues around nonprofit control and investor trust. It also exposes tensions between mission and scale. Observers now watch closely as the Musk-OpenAI lawsuit may set lasting precedents.
