8.7 C
London
Wednesday, January 15, 2025
HomeNewsTikTok Fights US Ban in Supreme Court, Warns of Wider Censorship Consequences

TikTok Fights US Ban in Supreme Court, Warns of Wider Censorship Consequences

Date:

Related stories

ChatGPT Gains Scheduling and Recurring Task Capabilities

OpenAI has introduced a new beta feature for ChatGPT...

Nvidia Invests in MetAI, a Taiwanese Startup Developing AI-Powered Digital Twins

Nvidia, a leading name in artificial intelligence and graphics...

Sony Is Working To Fix The Lag Problems With PlayStation in Online Games

Sony seems to be researching solutions to address the...

Apple AI Fitness Coach Advancing Past Development Stage

Almost two years after we originally learned about it,...

Crypto Crime Wave: North Korea’s $659 Million Heist Exposed

The US, South Korea, and Japan have joined forces...
spot_imgspot_img

Pcmag report says TikTok’s legal team has urged the US Supreme Court to reconsider a ban on the app, arguing that it could set a precedent for wider censorship and government control over online content. The app, owned by China-based ByteDance, is facing a ban in the US unless it’s sold to a non-Chinese owner.

During oral arguments, TikTok’s lawyers emphasized that the ban is not only unfair but also threatens the freedom of expression and access to information for millions of Americans. They argued that the US government’s concerns about data security can be addressed through other means, such as regulations and safeguards, rather than an outright ban.

Noel Francisco, a lawyer representing TikTok and ByteDance, warned the justices that supporting the law could allow the US government to censor content it dislikes. He cited the example of AMC movie theaters, which was previously owned by a Chinese company, and suggested that Congress could order the theater to censor certain movies.

Jeffrey Fisher, a lawyer representing TikTok content creators, questioned why TikTok is being singled out for harsher restrictions when other Chinese-owned firms, such as e-commerce site Temu, are not facing the same scrutiny. Fisher argued that the law is unfairly targeting TikTok and that the government’s concerns about data security are not unique to the app.

US Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar argued that the ban is necessary to protect national security and prevent China from accessing sensitive user data. Prelogar emphasized that the US government has a responsibility to protect Americans’ data and that the ban is a necessary measure to prevent China from exploiting this data for its own purposes.

 

The Supreme Court’s decision will have significant implications for the future of online free speech and the global tech industry. If the court upholds the ban, it could set a precedent for the US government to censor online content and restrict access to certain apps and websites. On the other hand, if the court rules in favor of TikTok, it UA could limit the government’s ability to regulate online content and protect the rights of tech companies to operate freely in the US.

Tochukwu Ugwu
Tochukwu Ugwuhttps://techpolyp.com/
Tochukwu Ugwu is a multifaceted enthusiast with a passion for technology, media, and artificial intelligence. As a tech enthusiast, I stay up to date on the latest innovations and trends in the digital landscape. With a keen interest in media, I explore the intersection of technology and data. Currently, I am an AI journalism fellow, harnessing the power of artificial intelligence to revolutionize the way we consume and interact with information.

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories

spot_img

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here